Explanation based on partner company cases
AI Collaboration

Open Geospatial Data and Recognition Models

How road images, spatial coordinates and LiDAR data are cleaned and validated for open databases and object recognition, including the areas of collaboration.

Illustration for Open Geospatial Data and Recognition Models
This is an explanatory image to help you understand the topic. It does not represent actual product screens or quantitative performance.
i

Information on partner company disclosure cases and technology application methods. Roles and quantitative performance for each project are guided based on performance data.

To connect spatial information open data and recognition models, source images, coordinates, and lidar data must be structured and quality reviewed using the same standards. This article introduces the application structure leading to data collection and purification, open database design, and road object recognition.

How do we use the data we collect?

stepmain taskDeliverables to review
Spatial data cleaningSummary of acquisition conditions and connection standards for images, coordinates, and lidarData lists and metadata
Purification/De-identificationCheck for coordinate/format errors and whether personal information is includedPurification rules and processing records
Open DB designDefine schema, format, usage conditions and labelsStructured data and quality review materials
Recognition Model UtilizationEvaluate detection and classification of objects such as lanes, signs, and signalsRecognition results and evaluation records by type

What quality standards are needed?

  • Check data rights and scope of disclosure and learning use.
  • Check the shooting conditions, coordinate system, metadata, and image connection.
  • We review whether to process de-identified objects such as license plates and faces.
  • Label location/classification and omissions/errors are evaluated based on established standards.
  • The model reviews the evaluation data together with false positives, false positives, and measurement indicators by type.

Formats such as COCO·GeoJSON and indicators such as IoU·mAP·F1 can be selected depending on the purpose of application. This page does not present specific achievement values ​​or inspection passing rates as confirmed achievements.

How are the roles of GLT and partners divided?

areaRole in collaboration
GLT KoreaSpatial information/image linkage schema, data collection/purification requirements, metadata and label quality review system
AI technology partnersDesign and implementation of AI model, agent, and platform, and model evaluation and operation technology
Customer company/operating organizationData use rights, business review, application approval and operating policy

The table above divides the areas of collaboration, and the actual scope of performance and output for each project is confirmed according to the contract and division of work.

Explanatory experience flow

You can envision a flow that looks at source data and coordinates, checks quality review items, and then compares object recognition results. The infographics and step descriptions in the text do not represent actual operating screens or real-time model execution results.

Disclosure and scope of explanation

Introduction to Serendex Public ProjectIntroduces a national spatial information agency's open DB/machine learning recognition model and an example of establishing a foundation for utilizing autonomous driving data.

This article explains the application structure based on the published examples and the domain perspective of GLT. Each customer's contract period, inspection results, and quantitative performance are provided separately from the technical description on this page.

YOUR OPERATIONS / NEXT STEP

Where should we begin to review our company's logistics challenges?

Please let us know how you currently operate and what you would like to change. From business analysis to data, system, and field application scope, we organize them together.

Please choose a situation that is close to our company.

Having these materials will be helpful in your review.

  • Current work flow
  • Situation you want to improve
  • Systems in use and data readiness

Even if you don't have any data yet, you can tell us about your current situation. Information that is difficult to disclose may be reviewed as a sample with identifying information masked.

In consultation, the scope is set as follows.

  1. Check current work and improvement goals
  2. Summary of data/constraints and comparative verification scope
  3. Link to existing systems and discuss scope of construction
Consult on our company’s assignments Apply without registering and select system/size input
REFERENCESView Source / References ↗

Please check the guidance in the text for the scope covered by the material. The date of publication of the original text and the actual performance period are distinguished.

STAY CONNECTED

Stay up to date with logistics.

Cases, product news and implementation guides for your interests. Subscribe with email verification and your consent.

Subscribe to GLT →
LET’S SOLVE IT TOGETHER

What logistics challenge
are you facing?

Talk to GLT ↗