Explanation based on partner company cases
AI Collaboration

Evidence-Based Enterprise AI and Operational Handover

Using a partner’s published case, we explain enterprise AI with document-based evidence, quality and cost management, and handover to IT and operations teams.

Illustration for Evidence-Based Enterprise AI and Operational Handover
This is an explanatory image to help you understand the topic. It does not represent actual product screens or quantitative performance.
i

Information on partner company disclosure cases and technology application methods. Roles and quantitative performance for each project are guided based on performance data.

AI that supports in-house work must find relevant evidence in regulations and business documents, provide answers, and be utilized in accordance with the user's authority and actual work procedures. Even after construction, it is important to have a structure that continues document updating, quality review, cost management, and operational transfer.

How do you create a grounded answer?

Search augmentation generation (RAG) is an approach that retrieves documents related to a question and uses them as the basis for an answer. It is designed to link the document version with the corresponding clause and lead to confirmation by the responsible department in cases where there is insufficient evidence or interpretation is required.

Sample question: “Please tell me the proof and approval process required to settle travel expenses.” The answer includes information on applicable regulations, reference points, and confirmation procedures. This question is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the actual regulations of any particular client company.

From construction to operation transfer

stepmain task
buildDocument organization, authority/security scope, search and evidence connection, field review flow design
Operation OptimizationEvaluation queries and regression testing, error, cost and delay monitoring, document and model change management
Operation transferOperation manual, code/configuration, test data and failure response procedures, training for personnel

Under what conditions is performance confirmed?

Base your answer Compare suitability, error handling, processing time and operational costs with established evaluation data. The model/document version, question type/sample, base period, and included costs must be recorded together to interpret the results.

Cost management methods such as semantic cache are applied considering data changes and answer update conditions. We do not guarantee a specific cost reduction rate or answer accuracy regardless of the adoption environment.

Materials to be inherited by the operating organization

  • Document upload/update and re-indexing procedures
  • Evaluation questions/expected answers and quality regression testing
  • Information on accounts, permissions, distribution, recovery and failure response
  • Monitoring standards for cost, delay, and user feedback

How are the roles of GLT and partners divided?

areaRole in collaboration
GLT KoreaSummary of company regulations, work processes and results review standards, inspection and operation transfer requirements for each business scenario
AI technology partnersDesign and implementation of AI model, agent, and platform, and model evaluation and operation technology
Customer company/operating organizationData use rights, business review, application approval and operating policy

The table above divides the areas of collaboration, and the actual scope of performance and output for each project is confirmed according to the contract and division of work.

Disclosure and scope of explanation

Introduction to Serendex Public ProjectIntroduces a case of a global home appliance manufacturer's in-house business AI construction, technical support, and operation transfer, as well as the participation of MSP partner positions.

This article explains the application structure based on the published examples and the domain perspective of GLT. Each customer's contract period, inspection results, and quantitative performance are provided separately from the technical description on this page.

YOUR OPERATIONS / NEXT STEP

Where should we begin to review our company's logistics challenges?

Please let us know how you currently operate and what you would like to change. From business analysis to data, system, and field application scope, we organize them together.

Please choose a situation that is close to our company.

Having these materials will be helpful in your review.

  • Current work flow
  • Situation you want to improve
  • Systems in use and data readiness

Even if you don't have any data yet, you can tell us about your current situation. Information that is difficult to disclose may be reviewed as a sample with identifying information masked.

In consultation, the scope is set as follows.

  1. Check current work and improvement goals
  2. Summary of data/constraints and comparative verification scope
  3. Link to existing systems and discuss scope of construction
Consult on our company’s assignments Apply without registering and select system/size input
REFERENCESView Source / References ↗

Please check the guidance in the text for the scope covered by the material. The date of publication of the original text and the actual performance period are distinguished.

STAY CONNECTED

Stay up to date with logistics.

Cases, product news and implementation guides for your interests. Subscribe with email verification and your consent.

Subscribe to GLT →
LET’S SOLVE IT TOGETHER

What logistics challenge
are you facing?

Talk to GLT ↗